Comments on: Protection and Prohibition http://arlenegoldbard.com/2007/03/02/protection-and-prohibition/ Purpose & pleasure. Aligned. Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:23:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: rachel johnson http://arlenegoldbard.com/2007/03/02/protection-and-prohibition/#comment-328 rachel johnson Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:26:42 +0000 http://arlenegoldbard.com/2007/03/02/protection-and-prohibition/#comment-328 Hello, Arlene. I met you last week at the University of Oregon. I am a student and I am currently writing a paper on cultural consultants, which is why I came to check out your website. This post caught my attention, though, because I currently went through the "Human Subjects Compliance" procedure for my Master's degree research. My research is about online marketing for independent artists. It is very benign and entails virtually no risk for my subjects. They simply fill out a questionnaire about how often they use the internet. Anyway, my point is that I completely agree with you post. The human subjects procedures are not only restrictive, but also a waste of resources in many cases. Keep up your good work. It was a pleasure attending your talks last week. Hello, Arlene. I met you last week at the University of Oregon. I am a student and I am currently writing a paper on cultural consultants, which is why I came to check out your website.

This post caught my attention, though, because I currently went through the “Human Subjects Compliance” procedure for my Master’s degree research. My research is about online marketing for independent artists. It is very benign and entails virtually no risk for my subjects. They simply fill out a questionnaire about how often they use the internet. Anyway, my point is that I completely agree with you post. The human subjects procedures are not only restrictive, but also a waste of resources in many cases.

Keep up your good work. It was a pleasure attending your talks last week.

]]>