<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stepping Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arlenegoldbard.com/2009/02/01/stepping-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arlenegoldbard.com/2009/02/01/stepping-up/</link>
	<description>Purpose &#38; pleasure. Aligned.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:23:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teaching Artist</title>
		<link>http://arlenegoldbard.com/2009/02/01/stepping-up/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Teaching Artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arlenegoldbard.com/?p=506#comment-543</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read your two excellent articles on the WPA and I&#039;m still not totally convinced it&#039;s the way to go. I want to believe, but I can&#039;t and here&#039;s why: I&#039;m a professional teaching artist trying to sustain a career in the field and I am entitled to a living wage, health care and freedom of speech. The WPA approach you outline is a deal with the devil and a distraction from a larger fight for basic human rights. I don&#039;t see the WPA solving my need for health coverage in the long-term and I predict censorship and other unacceptable forms of control over content. If there are bread lines on the way, sure, sign me up for the WPA. I need to eat. But otherwise, I want to focus on joining the larger effort to secure universal health care and I want a Union to represent my interests. Those two things will improve the quality of my life much more than a government check and all the bureaucracy and censorship I am certain will come with a WPA style approach. I don&#039;t think that&#039;s cynicism. That&#039;s strategic. Why stand alone demanding our fair share? Let&#039;s join the AFL-CIO or the UFT and fight as part of a larger community. The people we should be yelling at are running the Educational establishment. It&#039;s clear that many of our natural allies think art and artists are extraneous. The money is going to go into the schools. Let&#039;s get in on that party. I love your stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read your two excellent articles on the WPA and I&#8217;m still not totally convinced it&#8217;s the way to go. I want to believe, but I can&#8217;t and here&#8217;s why: I&#8217;m a professional teaching artist trying to sustain a career in the field and I am entitled to a living wage, health care and freedom of speech. The WPA approach you outline is a deal with the devil and a distraction from a larger fight for basic human rights. I don&#8217;t see the WPA solving my need for health coverage in the long-term and I predict censorship and other unacceptable forms of control over content. If there are bread lines on the way, sure, sign me up for the WPA. I need to eat. But otherwise, I want to focus on joining the larger effort to secure universal health care and I want a Union to represent my interests. Those two things will improve the quality of my life much more than a government check and all the bureaucracy and censorship I am certain will come with a WPA style approach. I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s cynicism. That&#8217;s strategic. Why stand alone demanding our fair share? Let&#8217;s join the AFL-CIO or the UFT and fight as part of a larger community. The people we should be yelling at are running the Educational establishment. It&#8217;s clear that many of our natural allies think art and artists are extraneous. The money is going to go into the schools. Let&#8217;s get in on that party. I love your stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

