<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arlene&#8217;s Wager</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arlenegoldbard.com/2009/07/03/arlenes-wager/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arlenegoldbard.com/2009/07/03/arlenes-wager/</link>
	<description>culture, politics and spirituality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:52:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Susan King</title>
		<link>http://arlenegoldbard.com/2009/07/03/arlenes-wager/comment-page-1/#comment-160165</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arlenegoldbard.com/?p=650#comment-160165</guid>
		<description>Jeff&#039;s comment reminds me of Jack Kornfield&#039;s book &quot;After the Ecstasy, the Laundry&quot;, a wonderful book about such come-downs and much more.  I haven&#039;t arrived at the &quot;single understanding&quot; alluded to above, but I sense it is possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff&#8217;s comment reminds me of Jack Kornfield&#8217;s book &#8220;After the Ecstasy, the Laundry&#8221;, a wonderful book about such come-downs and much more.  I haven&#8217;t arrived at the &#8220;single understanding&#8221; alluded to above, but I sense it is possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff white</title>
		<link>http://arlenegoldbard.com/2009/07/03/arlenes-wager/comment-page-1/#comment-157317</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff white</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arlenegoldbard.com/?p=650#comment-157317</guid>
		<description>Beautiful post, as always.  I love it when you ask these deep questions.

I think that we might take a good look at that word &quot;ambivalence.&quot;  Ambivalence is our very nature.  Yes, we are numinous beings.  Yes, we are animals.  We don&#039;t have to decide which to believe; both are true.  In meditation, I occasionally find a space of awareness, where I recognize that I am spirit.  Or love.  Or consciousness (or whatever word you want to use), and that I am connected to everything/everyone else in the universe, that there is no separation.  No duality.  And then, I get up from my cushion, and I go to the grocery store and check my bank balance online and put my shirts in the washer...all the things that &quot;separate&quot; creatures do.  I mourn those gone from my life.  I get lonely.  It could be that some day these two separate ways of knowing/being will come together into a single understanding...but I doubt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful post, as always.  I love it when you ask these deep questions.</p>
<p>I think that we might take a good look at that word &#8220;ambivalence.&#8221;  Ambivalence is our very nature.  Yes, we are numinous beings.  Yes, we are animals.  We don&#8217;t have to decide which to believe; both are true.  In meditation, I occasionally find a space of awareness, where I recognize that I am spirit.  Or love.  Or consciousness (or whatever word you want to use), and that I am connected to everything/everyone else in the universe, that there is no separation.  No duality.  And then, I get up from my cushion, and I go to the grocery store and check my bank balance online and put my shirts in the washer&#8230;all the things that &#8220;separate&#8221; creatures do.  I mourn those gone from my life.  I get lonely.  It could be that some day these two separate ways of knowing/being will come together into a single understanding&#8230;but I doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
