I’m giving little attention to the 23-candidates-and-counting race for the Democratic presidential nomination. I figure the ones who are doing it to raise their national exposure, banking name recognition for some future contest, will drop out. I look forward to watching the rest of them duke it out via rallies, debates, and of course, Twitter, and to use any influence I may have to ensure that the Present Occupant of the White House leaves Washington in defeat.
But when the race heats up, I will learn all I can through the lens I always use when it comes to elections, whether national or closer to home. Which candidate has the qualifications I prize: integrity, honesty, capability, heart, wisdom, presence? I can’t expect one person to hit the mark in every way, but too many misses and I’d be a fool to give my vote.
That’s why I was so disturbed to see that Valerie Plame is running for Congress in my district to replace Representative Ben Ray Luján, himself running to replace retiring Democratic Senator Tom Udall. Stepping down, Udall said, “Without the distraction of another campaign, I can get so much more done to help reverse the damage done to our planet, end the scourge of war, and to stop this president’s assault on our democracy and our communities,” which puts a rather fine point on the culture of electoral politics under the present administration.
If Plame’s name rings a bell, it’s probably from what has come to be called the “Plame Affair,” in which Plame was outed as a covert CIA officer in 2003. This Wikipedia page has an extensive chronology with many links, but if you google her name and CIA, you will find an abundance of sources.
If it rings a more recent bell, the cause is likely a series of antisemitic tweets Plame made in 2017. Plame evidently thinks she apologized for tweeting out her statements about Jews being behind 9/11 and wars in general, but as far as I can see, all she offered were excuses. She is quoted as saying she “only skimmed” the sites she shared via Twitter, that she was going through a lot at the time and “I should not have been anywhere near social media or a computer at that time in my life.”
I have no wish to get into the evergreen argument about whether a secret service is a necessary and proper function of democratic government. The precursor to the Central Intelligence Agency was the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), created during World War II to gather intelligence via espionage as part of the war effort. You won’t find many objections to covert action against the Nazis and other fascists. President Truman dissolved the agency after the war and a few months later, set in motion the CIA, the United States’ first peacetime international intelligence agency.
The question isn’t so much whether the agency should exist as whether it should be free to commit an appallingly large and terrible number of clandestine acts of violence and terrorism. Take a glance at this compilation of human rights violations by the CIA. The agency’s language is itself nauseating: “enhanced interrogation” (that’s waterboarding and other forms of torture, thoroughly documented by agencies ranging from the Red Cross to Human Rights Watch); “extraordinary rendition” (clandestinely transporting a captive to a foreign interrogation center not subject to U.S. law or constitutional rights); illegal experiments on U.S. citizens, including drug-fueld behavioral control experiments on unwitting subjects; many assassinations, some attempted and some accomplished; and much more.
Valerie Plame was engaged in covert activities at the CIA, so we will never know for certain precisely what she did. We have her own comments to go on—she wrote a book that was made into a movie and she has also given a large number of talks and interviews—and David Corn’s account. Both accounts highlight her role in recruiting operatives who, like herself, worked the agenda of the agency responsible for the reprehensible acts noted above.
Plame evidently thinks this qualifies her for public office. This is promotional copy from her website:
While at the CIA, Valerie worked to protect America’s national security. She helped prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, specifically nuclear weapons. She managed top-secret covert programs designed to keep terrorists and rogue nation states from acquiring nuclear weapons. She was responsible for decision making at senior levels, recruiting foreign assets, managing multi-million dollar budgets, briefing US policy-makers, and demonstrating consistently solid judgment in a field where mistakes could prove disastrous.
So let’s see how Plame lines up by my criteria: integrity, honesty, capability, heart, wisdom, presence. For all I know, she could be a lovely person who is delightful to her friends and kind to her pets. But none of that matters since she was quite happy to lie for a living at the CIA, and apparently felt just fine about continuing her tenure there despite all the human rights violations for which the agency is culpable. She couldn’t be troubled even to read the vicious antisemitism she tweeted to her many followers, nor to consider how the ideas she lazily endorsed support white supremacy and hurt those it targets. I would no more want to put such a person in a position to protect my civil liberties and democracy than I would appoint a fox to watch the hen-house. Would you?
There is a candidate in this race who appeals to me and who deserves the contributions from Democrats that Plame, with her social status and connections, seems to have no trouble attracting. Teresa Leger Fernandez is a local attorney much of whose practice is representing tribal governments. Read this interview with her in a local paper and judge for yourself: someone who has crusaded for voting rights, who defends Indigenous communities, who supports the Green New Deal and women’s right to choose, versus someone whose claim to fame is being caught lying for a living?
Bettye LaVette and Keith Richards do Bob Dylan’s “Political World.”
[…] by activist and artist Arlene Goldberg in a recent blog post: To find out how Goldberg weighed in, click here. But please comment below as to how you […]
Brava Arlene! Thanks immeasurably for the post and your commitment to truth. Look forward to reading more of your posts.
There are at minimum two questions here: Can she run?; should she run? She is a citizen, presumably, and native born, so she can run. Should she?
Since WW2, it is questionable if this nation ever engaged in a legitimate act of military aggression anywhere on the planet. Depending upon ones POV, anything this nation does is just A-OK, or much, if not all, of its escapades abroad were blatant acts of hegemony. The CIA is not only a big player in this debate, but it operated then and now with virtually no lawful or ethical restraints.
This is not rocket science. These are spooks, and they do nasty things, to put it mildly. All these intrusive actions made this nation myriad enemies, not the other way around. So as to motive, a spook seeking public office, allegedly to stand in for individual citizens, and not for national security priorities, would have to either rewrite history or redefine logic.
The real question is not should Plame run, but should any individual citizen expect her to carry their best interests to Congress, or continue to think and act like a spook? Given her background, I am putting money on the spook, but not my vote.
Thank You Ms Goldberg!
Ms Plame has been a local darling, in certain social circles. Her name had national recognition, after her outing by republican political operatives. That dark episode in American history and the lies that led us to war with Iraq, are still being perpetuated. The same malignant forces that led us into war, are now in public office again, plotting to enrich themselves at the expense of what is left of our foreign policy.
There is a kind of bubble around the socially and politically connected in Santa Fe. Joining this oblivious social circle, made me question Plames, worldview. As a CIA officer, she was just doing her job which was commendable on some level. The reason our CIA was there in the first place and the damage they have done across the planet, was never acknowledged. While we can admire her bravery and public service, it can’t be reconciled with local issues.
She was chosen because of name recognition, not because she has anything to add to local issues. She is a quasi celebrity around here, which insulates her from reality.
[…] outed as a covert CIA officer; and again in 2017 for a series of repugnant antisemitic tweets. My original essay explains why I am disturbed by her candidacy and why she is not qualified to hold public […]
Thank you for the clarity of this statement.
Like many who arrive in Santa Fe, Plame thinks she knows something about New Mexico — and is just another carpet bagger.
[…] find the first, “Lying for A Living: Is Valerie Plame Qualified for Public Office” here. In it I questioned Plame’s fitness on two main grounds: the truth of her CIA role as a […]